It's not the best technology that wins; it's the technology that solves today's problems faster, cheaper, and, most importantly, is good enough.
History is littered with examples where breakthrough innovations lost to simpler, faster-to-market solutions. Betamax was technically superior, but VHS won. Electric vehicles existed decades ago, but hybrids like the Toyota Prius captured hearts first. The problem isn’t just technological innovation; it’s timing, societal challenges and relevance of user problems.
Technologies built for long-term value often miss the mark because societal needs evolve slower or faster than the innovation cycle. Worse, sometimes the problem a technology was designed to solve disappears before the tech arrives. This phenomenon—called Future Technology Myopia—is the silent killer of many bold inventions. But here’s the kicker: low-tech, “good enough” solutions often beat their high-tech counterparts simply because they get to the customer first.
The Tension: Society’s Urgency vs. Technology’s Timeline
The world doesn’t wait for your R&D team. Climate change, public health, economic crises—they demand answers now. High-tech solutions, with their years-long development timelines, often fail to keep up with the breakneck pace of societal change.
Take renewable energy as an example. While we were designing the perfect solar panels, fossil fuel alternatives like natural gas surged ahead. Why? They were faster to implement in existing systems (pain and willingness to change = high) and more accessible. The same is true for telehealth during the pandemic: while advanced AI diagnostic tools were still in labs, simple video conferencing apps became life-saving tools.
Technological progress is slow. Societal challenges aren’t. That gap is where simpler solutions win.
Overestimating the Short Term, Underestimating the Long Term
High-tech solutions suffer from two extremes:
They’re overhyped for what they can do in the short term.
They’re undervalued for their transformative potential in the long term.
Take electric vehicles. In the 1990s, automakers launched early EVs with grand promises. But they flopped—too expensive, too inconvenient. Meanwhile, hybrids quietly crept into the market, offering a “good enough” bridge between old and new. Today, Tesla’s dominance proves EVs are finally delivering on their long-term potential. The lesson? The market rewards simple, incremental changes while waiting for tech to mature.
Navigating the Dilemma of the Technology Management
Organizations often fall into predictable traps when trying to align technology with societal needs. Here are some typical responses:
“Not Invented Here”: Dismissing existing solutions simply because they weren’t developed in-house.
“That Already Exists”: Rejecting innovation by assuming current solutions are sufficient, while ignoring their gaps.
“Maybe in 10 Years”: Overlooking immediate opportunities by deferring investments to an uncertain future.
“Too Niche”: Disregarding technologies that address smaller problems but could scale to meet broader needs over time.
These attitudes are often rooted in a fear of risk, internal biases, or an inability to adapt to changing market dynamics. If left unchecked, they prevent organizations from seizing opportunities where “good enough” solutions could have a substantial impact.
The Adaptability Factor: Turning Tech to New Problems
Here’s another reason good enough wins: adaptability. Technologies designed for one problem can pivot to solve another.
Think about GPS. Initially a military tool, its civilian applications—from navigation to ride-sharing apps—dwarfed its original purpose. Even high-tech solutions can win if they’re flexible enough to jump to the next big problem. But too often, tech is rigid, stuck solving yesterday’s problems instead of evolving with tomorrow’s needs.
Why "Good Enough" Often Wins the Market
Market penetration isn’t about perfection—it’s about timing, accessibility, and cost. The best product doesn’t always win. The one people can afford and adopt today does.
Consider VHS vs. Betamax. Betamax had better picture quality, but VHS offered longer recording times and was cheaper to produce. That’s it. Consumers didn’t care about marginally better quality; they wanted convenience. VHS became the global standard because it solved a problem simply and quickly.
The same dynamic is playing out in today’s tech markets. From no-code software platforms to low-cost fintech solutions, simplicity and speed trump complexity and perfection.
The Lesson for Inventors: Timing is Everything
History’s greatest inventions weren’t always the most advanced—they were the ones implemented within a viable business model. They were the most accessible solutions at the right time. Inventors must ask themselves:
Is this technology solving a problem people care about now?
Can it adapt if the problem changes?
How does it stack up against simpler, faster-to-market alternatives?
Betting on perfection is a gamble. Betting on “good enough” might win you the market.
Conclusion: Stop Waiting for Perfect
In the end, the best solutions aren’t the ones we dream about—they’re the ones we use.
The world doesn’t need your perfect solution in five years. It needs a solution today. High-tech innovation will always have its place, but if you’re not delivering immediate, accessible value, you’re leaving the door open for simpler, faster competitors to beat you.
It’s not about low-tech versus high-tech. It’s about understanding timing, adaptability, and relevance. In the race to solve societal challenges, don’t let future technology myopia blind you. Sometimes, the simplest answers are the most disruptive.
Want to read more? Visit my blog or better subscribe to my newsletter.
P.S: Do you want to know more about how to make your innovation project successful and avoiding typical pitfalls?
Extend your team and knowledge on a temporary or permanent basis: Contact me for a conversation.
Transfer the knowledge: Book one of the innovation bootcamps
Get a keynote on this topic for your organization: Book a keynote now